PDA

View Full Version : Sex in Space... wat?



burnout
12-02-2008, 11:58 AM
http://www.history.com/shows.do?episodeId=389084&action=detail

Hmm... anyone got a torrent? i'm interested in the many new positions that comes with zero g

Deuxsonic
12-02-2008, 01:15 PM
I'm sure that special isn't as interesting as you're imagining...

redshirt
12-02-2008, 01:39 PM
Don't forget your 2suit. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2suit

solarenemy
12-02-2008, 02:52 PM
Actually it would be very difficult. Sex requires you to able to get traction and or leverage in order to thrust. With no gravity there is nothing to push or brace against. She or he will just move away when you thrust towards and you will continue to move towards them after your first thrust. In fact you wont be able to pull back since there is nothing to get traction on. it just would not be a very fun or arousing experience in my opinion. It would in fact be much more work then normal sex and would quickly become a chore.

Sibushang
12-02-2008, 03:12 PM
Well although the sex may be difficult to pull off, You should still be able to enjoy some interesting foreplay... As for releasing that built up excitement, I guess someone could volunteer to get strapped down :P. Sounds like a perfect scenario for someone into kinky sex.

Areskel
12-02-2008, 03:33 PM
The 2Suit is based on an interesting principle I find proven by my own experience. Proximity is important.

Solarenemy, considering you are relative, you'd still be able to at least get thrust going if you just hold on to her, or you just brace against the side of the craft. Obviously would take some extra hand coordination, and probably some extra effort, but it certainly sounds doable. Not to mention the novelty the first couple of times.

redshirt
12-02-2008, 03:49 PM
Unless you have a vacuum to clean up your... juices, it's going to be messy. Of course, you could build a shower enclosure like the one in Skylab.

animedoll
12-02-2008, 04:00 PM
...would love to see this..

GenerationKamenRider
12-02-2008, 04:12 PM
I would love to see this as well. Just for the lulz.

S76
12-02-2008, 04:14 PM
lol definately wouldnt work, solarenemy pretty much explained the physics behind it. Newtons third law "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." Thrusting will push u away from the other person lol

redshirt
12-02-2008, 04:25 PM
The physics of zero-g sex is like underwater sex, and that's been done before.

solarenemy
12-02-2008, 04:38 PM
The physics of zero-g sex is like underwater sex, and that's been done before.

Actually they are not. Water exerts pressure against you which will cancel newtons law regarding every action. In space you don't have the pressure and resistance against you. That's why in water you cab actually build muscle simply by moving your arms and legs through like your walking. In space there is no force and in fact your muscles weaken. That's why astronauts are limited on how long they can stay on the station. They have to come back to earth to rebuild their muscles. Also keep in mind that in water things implode and not explode due to the positive pressure where in space you have negative pressure so no force there and zero g so no force there. If you thrust towards a girl she will be pushed away and continue to travel away unless you grab her. It will also push you away from her unless you grab her. So you are to busy fighting to keep together that sex will become more work then pleasure. The only way it would work is to create an elastic sleeping bag/cocoon that will keep you two pushed together so that you had to push apart to pull away. The the elastic would counter the zero g effects.

Some of you seem to have missed a few lessons in physics. Sick that day? The only reason astronauts train in water is because it makes them seem lighter due to buoyancy and that simulates the feeling of space. It also simulates an oxygen free atmosphere in the event of a leak or vessel breach so they can work on repairs in emergency conditions.

Synel
12-02-2008, 04:47 PM
Actually it would be very difficult. Sex requires you to able to get traction and or leverage in order to thrust. With no gravity there is nothing to push or brace against. She or he will just move away when you thrust towards and you will continue to move towards them after your first thrust. In fact you wont be able to pull back since there is nothing to get traction on. it just would not be a very fun or arousing experience in my opinion. It would in fact be much more work then normal sex and would quickly become a chore.

Well I'm assuming you'd also be holding on to the girl. I can imagine zero-g sex, just hope you don't hit the walls that often.

...OK so it might be a little tough but with all your force going in one direction (don't ask me for the specifics) you could potentially use a wall.

But on a side note, another problem posed as quoted from Peter Griffin when commenting on his trip to space: "I also had plenty o time to rub one out, after awhile though it was like livin in a snow globe."

hell0512
12-02-2008, 04:47 PM
firstly they have to invent gravtiy control!!!

i don't think human technology have reach that level

so don't think about sex in space

redshirt
12-02-2008, 05:02 PM
Some of you seem to have missed a few lessons in physics. Sick that day? The only reason astronauts train in water is because it makes them seem lighter due to buoyancy and that simulates the feeling of space. It also simulates an oxygen free atmosphere in the event of a leak or vessel breach so they can work on repairs in emergency conditions.

I said "like" not "same", but whatever...


If you thrust towards a girl she will be pushed away and continue to travel away unless you grab her. It will also push you away from her unless you grab her. The only way it would work is to create an elastic sleeping bag/cocoon that will keep you two pushed together so that you had to push apart to pull away. The the elastic would counter the zero g effects.

That's why the 2suit was designed. Two suits come together and have connections to keep the occupants close.

Looks ugly as hell, though.

solarenemy
12-02-2008, 05:23 PM
firstly they have to invent gravtiy control!!!

i don't think human technology have reach that level

so don't think about sex in space

Gravity control has been around since the days when MIR was in orbit. Of course most of you don't remember MIR as you where to young or not even around yet. To achieve gravity for occupants in a vehicle or station all they have to do is make a part or all of the station rotate. The rotation will pull the occupants to one surface through centrifugal force and make them think there is gravity. Right now it is not economical nor practicle to simulate gravity as most of the experiments done on the space station are done to see the effects that zero g's have on various processes. if they want gravity they simply come back to Earth.

Shragei
12-02-2008, 06:35 PM
It's not the act of having sex in space that is a problem. It's quite simple. When impulse meets obstacle, impulse will over come obstacle.
The problem is comes afterwards. Fertilization and fetus development would be the problem.

Neromise
12-02-2008, 06:44 PM
Wait Then how did that female astronaut get pregnant in space?

AngelsThesis
12-02-2008, 06:57 PM
the title of this thread depicts the exact words i want out of my mouth.

Athias
12-02-2008, 08:48 PM
One small step for man, one giant fuck for all mankind.

Karis Fra Mauro
12-02-2008, 08:50 PM
Although I'm not aware of any pregnancies, there is ample reason to believe sex in space has already happened. Comparing it to being underwater is not precise of course but it is helpful. The closest analog in nature is with dolphins, them being roughly similar to humans in anatomy and proportions. That dolphins require a third partner to keep the other two from bouncing off each other leads to the coloquial designation for the act. As air travel has the "mile high" club, so space has the "three dolphin" club. This goes back at least to the 80's as far as I am aware. Back to the things that separate space from mere underwater though. Blood will be redirected from the lower half of the body to the upper. Good point, super boobies. Bad point, limp weiner. Of course where there is a will there is a way and this is not an insupperable problem. The other longer term aspect is brutal back problems. The disks in the back gradually spread apart due to the absense of gravity which means pain. Calcium leaching from the bones doesn't help either.

6531597
12-03-2008, 01:05 AM
where there's a will, there's a way...

shiracld
12-03-2008, 06:41 AM
dont you guys worry~!
as soon as we get up there mankind will evolve
and have interesting ways to hold the preyher.......
tentacles anyone~?

NightviSion
12-03-2008, 07:18 AM
Sky diving sex? Anyone tried this?

solarenemy
12-03-2008, 08:15 AM
Sky diving sex? Anyone tried this?

Have you seen the harness that a parachute has? It has two large straps that go between your legs and will cover the important parts of the girl and cause some real discomfort around a guys exposed junk. Now if you do it without parachutes, that would be different but of course that sudden stop at the end would not be something to look forward to. If you know somebody who owns a jump training center with vertical wind tunnel then you might be able to talk them into having some after hours time in the tunnel where you would be able to not use a chute and not have to worry about that sudden stop.:kakashi:

Tiexandrea
12-03-2008, 08:35 AM
"oooh oooh, i'm cumming!"

"don't cum inside! cum all over me!"

"here i go!"

"... ... ... huh? where's your cum?"

"WTF!? it's floating all around the place!"

worudqw
12-03-2008, 09:35 AM
I'm starting to think what I do is quite ordinary.....but this is pretty funny stuff people could think of lol... Although I don't think I'd be into this....(for various reasons)

psychopompos
12-03-2008, 01:33 PM
lol definately wouldnt work, solarenemy pretty much explained the physics behind it. Newtons third law "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." Thrusting will push u away from the other person lol
grab her hips, use your arms, its not difficult.
like sex standing up/in i pool, but without the weight/extra friction...

--------------------

Newtons 3rd law my ass. grab the damn girl & to hell with missionary.
y'all fail at perverted imaginations.


"oooh oooh, i'm cumming!"

"don't cum inside! cum all over me!"

"here i go!"

"... ... ... huh? where's your cum?"

"WTF!? it's floating all around the place!"
it will go in the direction its shot in until air resistance stops it.
aim better:p

solarenemy
12-03-2008, 01:52 PM
grab her hips, use your arms, its not difficult.
like sex standing up/in i pool, but without the weight/extra friction...

--------------------

Newtons 3rd law my ass. grab the damn girl & to hell with missionary.
y'all fail at perverted imaginations.


it will go in the direction its shot in until air resistance stops it.
aim better:p

There is no air resistance in space. If you shoot a load it will travel in the direction it was shot till it hits something solid. Or if outside the spacecraft, it will freeze instantly and travel in the direction it was shot till it gets caught in the gravity well of a nearby moon/planet/asteroid where it will be pulled in to that bodies surface.

jrslime
12-03-2008, 02:13 PM
eh.. o.o i prefer gravity the pressure is priceless

psychopompos
12-03-2008, 03:49 PM
There is no air resistance in space. If you shoot a load it will travel in the direction it was shot till it hits something solid. Or if outside the spacecraft, it will freeze instantly and travel in the direction it was shot till it gets caught in the gravity well of a nearby moon/planet/asteroid where it will be pulled in to that bodies surface.

*if someone is fapping in zero g, they will be in a hospitable atmosphere one way or another.

*that atmosphere will be around 14 psi, just like the atmosphere you are in now.

*anything in an atmosphere will be subject to atmospheric resistance.

* there is going to be air in any place humans are shagging.

* like in a nice warm, pressurised (to 14psi) space ship.

*explosive decompression is likely more then just a bit of a mood killer.

Deranged Skillet
12-03-2008, 08:10 PM
The problem is comes afterwards. Fertilization and fetus development would be the problem.

9 months in space is not so much something I think anybody would want to plan for. Unless of course you hypothesized this splendid scenario for the distant future, which then, as everything futuristic must be, is suddenly more an atrocious commonality than a problem..

Sex in space. hmm.
perhaps they should start sending those astroguysandgals up in pairs
could prove to be a great way to add lengthage to a healthy tin-can-lifestyle duration.

esparta
12-03-2008, 08:40 PM
wow sex in space.. I wonder what kind of condom they use for that.

6531597
12-04-2008, 12:28 AM
wow sex in space.. I wonder what kind of condom they use for that.
Armstrong's Condom.
"It's Astronomic in Pleasure!" or
"It's out of this word!" or
"It's so light, you'd feel like you're floating in air!"

S76
12-04-2008, 03:58 AM
lol even sperm can be as dangerous as space dust lol imagine it destroying a planet

Tiexandrea
12-04-2008, 05:18 AM
There is no air resistance in space. If you shoot a load it will travel in the direction it was shot till it hits something solid. Or if outside the spacecraft, it will freeze instantly and travel in the direction it was shot till it gets caught in the gravity well of a nearby moon/planet/asteroid where it will be pulled in to that bodies surface.

LOLOLOLOL if the president went to outer space, it'd be easy to assassinate him.

jack off, aim at him, when your sperm comes out, it turns into an ice bullet instantly.

shiracld
12-04-2008, 06:24 AM
lol even sperm can be as dangerous as space dust lol imagine it destroying a planeti'm pretty sure that the gamma rays will have its way fiirst evolving it into a planetsized tadpole........

rkobe
12-04-2008, 09:23 AM
In order to practice the safe sex procedures established in the procedure manuals of every countries space agency. All astronauts must have clearance from ground control commanders and station commanders before the "Incident" occurs. Each level of achievement must be documented for study by the agencies administrators to advise for improvement of performance.
It is the mission of every astronaut to improve exploration techniques, to probe the unknown, to envelop the length of the exercise and to extend the duration and boundaries of human involvement in space.

shiracld
12-04-2008, 09:29 AM
once the japanese space elevator comes to life
i expect astronomical p0rn to be made

psychopompos
12-04-2008, 03:07 PM
^ just launch me & some female astronauts on the next nasa mission with the right kind of camera.

AyaKunoichi
12-04-2008, 03:14 PM
lol definately wouldnt work, solarenemy pretty much explained the physics behind it. Newtons third law "To every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." Thrusting will push u away from the other person lol

Why not just hold on tight?

solarenemy
12-04-2008, 03:55 PM
If you hold on tight you can't push away to pull back. If you let go to pull back then you with both drift apart. Even the smallest action has a reaction in the frictionless environment of zero g. Because there is no friction even small actions have a much gigher impact then actions would on earth.

Alupihan
12-04-2008, 04:05 PM
LOL space porn! :lol:

AyaKunoichi
12-04-2008, 06:59 PM
If you hold on tight you can't push away to pull back. If you let go to pull back then you with both drift apart. Even the smallest action has a reaction in the frictionless environment of zero g. Because there is no friction even small actions have a much gigher impact then actions would on earth.

Well you could Push away. Much like when you grab someone when your underwater.. you can still pull them and push them away cant you?

Seeing thats the closest ive gotten to Zero G...

PS: iam just asking Questions all mighty Solarenemy... Iam not doubting your brilliance.

solarenemy
12-04-2008, 07:14 PM
Water has pressure and resistance that pushes back on you when you push against it. It is not the same as zero g. Just think about everythinjg you do and all actions you make with your body. In all those situations your anchored and supported in some way so that each action is counter balanced by weight or force. In space you don't have that luxury.

Deranged Skillet
12-04-2008, 07:39 PM
The only way it would work is to create an elastic sleeping bag/cocoon that will keep you two pushed together so that you had to push apart to pull away. The the elastic would counter the zero g effects.

Or the elasticity in say, muscle tissue?

Grab the hips/waist. Hell, throw a belt in, if needbe. DO NOT let go when you push away, as there is no necessity in doing so when you can just as easily push your arms outward without losing control over your grip on your hostess.

I understand that there is nothing to offer as leverage for inertia being applied in either/all directions, and all of this pushing and pulling will likely result in utter exhaustion and bruises before either participant is satisfied. But I'm not seeing how this would disable your muscular capacity.
Though would surely be an excellent bi/tri/trap and lovehandle workout

psychopompos
12-04-2008, 07:40 PM
If you hold on tight you can't push away to pull back. If you let go to pull back then you with both drift apart. Even the smallest action has a reaction in the frictionless environment of zero g. Because there is no friction even small actions have a much gigher impact then actions would on earth.
think doggy style... in mid air... you grabbing her hips.
there is one position...
there's the sex standing up position(w/e its called again)
and many variations of the woman on top stuff could easily adapt to 0-g sex
anything where you can inact force on your partner could & most likely would work.

and you still seem to be confusing vacuum with zero gravity ¬_¬

solarenemy
12-04-2008, 08:03 PM
NO I AM NOT CONFUSING ANYTHING!

14psi against your body is insignificant pressure when it comes to leverage or any movement. Nothing that I am talking about would take place outside of a space ship or station. Doggy style requires you and her to be on your knees for leverage guess where your knees would be in zero g.

I am not saying it can't be done. I am saying that it will be so difficult that neither person will reach their goal and both will get so exhausted and yes beat up and bruised that the entire experience will not want to be performed again. You or her laying on top requires the one on top to be able to support themselves with arms or legs and guess where those will be in zero g. Standing position relies on her weight always being pulled downward so you can thrust up against that weight. There will be no weight to thrust against in zero g. You will spend more time trying to keep her from floating away with each thrust then you will with actually thinking about and achieving sex.

I grow weary of this discussion, so take it where ever you want. I was simply pointing out the trouble it would create would not be worth the reward you most likely would not achieve.

Synel
12-04-2008, 08:18 PM
Hmm... :O!!

OK, here's a diagram... a shitty diagram but a diagram
_/--\O
- /\__o\O;=; Handles
---------------------------

The floor = --------
Handle = ;=:
The woman = /\__o\O (...ok it's SUPPOSED to be a woman.)
The Man= _/---\~O

OK, now just picture that in your mind, now move the man down, and the handles to the side of the woman. Also throw in a belt or something and maybe indent the handles into the floor a bit.

There ya go... :)

AyaKunoichi
12-04-2008, 08:19 PM
NO I AM NOT CONFUSING ANYTHING!

14psi against your body is insignificant pressure when it comes to leverage or any movement. Nothing that I am talking about would take place outside of a space ship or station. Doggy style requires you and her to be on your knees for leverage guess where your knees would be in zero g.

I am not saying it can't be done. I am saying that it will be so difficult that neither person will reach their goal and both will get so exhausted and yes beat up and bruised that the entire experience will not want to be performed again. You or her laying on top requires the one on top to be able to support themselves with arms or legs and guess where those will be in zero g. Standing position relies on her weight always being pulled downward so you can thrust up against that weight. There will be no weight to thrust against in zero g. You will spend more time trying to keep her from floating away with each thrust then you will with actually thinking about and achieving sex.

I grow weary of this discussion, so take it where ever you want. I was simply pointing out the trouble it would create would not be worth the reward you most likely would not achieve.

Well I thought that you said it wasnt Possible.

Yeah I knew it would be a huge physical exertion. never said that wouldnt happen.

solarenemy
12-04-2008, 08:31 PM
Hmm... :O!!

OK, here's a diagram... a shitty diagram but a diagram
_/--\O
- /\__o\O;=; Handles
---------------------------

The floor = --------
Handle = ;=:
The woman = /\__o\O (...ok it's SUPPOSED to be a woman.)
The Man= _/---\~O

OK, now just picture that in your mind, now move the man down, and the handles to the side of the woman. Also throw in a belt or something and maybe indent the handles into the floor a bit.

There ya go... :)

This was about doing it without specially made equipment. The whole idea was two astronauts get horny and decide to just do it. The OP never mentioned belts, handles, or any other implements other then that suit. So please stay with the topic and rules set fourth by the OP.:kakashi:

The entire subject is how space and zero g would not only effect sex but child development within the womb as well. The idea would be not to have sex in zero g locations but wait till you are on a planet or a station with simulated gravity. The you could have sex normally and child development could take place in the womb normally. I agree that if we where not meant to do something then we most likely would not be able invent the means to do it. However I have to say that humans evolved in gravity and there for our bodies are adapted to using gravity for many of its processes. It would be centuries or more before man evolved to live in zero g and our bodies adapted to properly function in it. That is to say that we could even survive long enough in zero g to evolve into beings that could live in it properly. We might just die out in the process of achieving space conquest because our bodies can not spend too long in zero g with out debilitating side effects.

Falcao das Neves
12-04-2008, 08:55 PM
Sex is good anywhere.
If we have to do it in space can be sure that find a way to make it enjoyable.

psychopompos
12-04-2008, 09:04 PM
NO I AM NOT CONFUSING ANYTHING!

14psi against your body is insignificant pressure when it comes to leverage or any movement. Nothing that I am talking about would take place outside of a space ship or station. Doggy style requires you and her to be on your knees for leverage guess where your knees would be in zero g.
nope
upper body strength
use your arms on her hips to move her back & forward in relation to yourself

and 14psi gives enough resistance for mobility (admittedly limited acceleration control) when not touching anything otherwise bolted down.
with no other forces at work, aerodynamic resistance is a significant factor.


I am not saying it can't be done. I am saying that it will be so difficult that neither person will reach their goal and both will get so exhausted and yes beat up and bruised that the entire experience will not want to be performed again.rubbish
if you can reach yer goal having sex standing up, while holding the chicks weight too, it could be done much easier in 0-g.


You or her laying on top requires the one on top to be able to support themselves with arms or legs and guess where those will be in zero g. Standing position relies on her weight always being pulled downward so you can thrust up against that weight.and gravity can be replaced by the pair using each other for leverage, providing they where in a stable position in the capsule, they would stay there, regardless of repititions.
theres your laws of motion at work.


There will be no weight to thrust against in zero g. You will spend more time trying to keep her from floating away with each thrust then you will with actually thinking about and achieving sex.thats why you brace against/grap each other...


I grow weary of this discussion, so take it where ever you want. I was simply pointing out the trouble it would create would not be worth the reward you most likely would not achieve.dont be so condescending.


The entire subject is how space and zero g would not only effect sex but child development within the womb as well.
thats very true.
lack of bone structure development would be quite debilitating...


It would be centuries or more before man evolved to live in zero g and our bodies adapted to properly function in it. im guessing artificial genetic alteration to prevent muscle atrophy & weakening of the bones would be critical. outside of artificial gravity by some means

Synel
12-05-2008, 01:26 AM
This was about doing it without specially made equipment. The whole idea was two astronauts get horny and decide to just do it. The OP never mentioned belts, handles, or any other implements other then that suit. So please stay with the topic and rules set fourth by the OP.:kakashi:

The entire subject is how space and zero g would not only effect sex but child development within the womb as well. The idea would be not to have sex in zero g locations but wait till you are on a planet or a station with simulated gravity. The you could have sex normally and child development could take place in the womb normally. I agree that if we where not meant to do something then we most likely would not be able invent the means to do it. However I have to say that humans evolved in gravity and there for our bodies are adapted to using gravity for many of its processes. It would be centuries or more before man evolved to live in zero g and our bodies adapted to properly function in it. That is to say that we could even survive long enough in zero g to evolve into beings that could live in it properly. We might just die out in the process of achieving space conquest because our bodies can not spend too long in zero g with out debilitating side effects.

o_O... wow, guess I did get a bit off topic, sry. But as for evolving to live in 0 g envioronments I think we'd have to rely on technology for artificial gravity again. Someone already mentioned that I believe.

CainofAbol
02-17-2009, 02:36 PM
ROFL!
Zero G Sex

BOFH
02-17-2009, 06:47 PM
I'm pretty sure that, with some practice, sex can be done in space. However, the man should remember to never pull out. After all, you don't want to have the yucky stuff floating around all over the place... :D

jinjin
02-17-2009, 07:30 PM
You could try binding yourself to your partner with rubber exercise bands then thrust away as you both float all over the inside of a space station bouncing from wall to wall and ceiling to floor.

33Zephyr33
02-17-2009, 09:56 PM
Why dont you just do it in a wind tunnel?

vantoria
02-17-2009, 11:35 PM
lol clean up the juice using vaccum cleaner. hehehe... anyway what solar said is quite right, we can possible done that without any machine aid or maybe something... some special equipment. but. it's sure a great theme for new hentai release xD

6531597
02-18-2009, 04:43 AM
Do a barrel roll!

random100818-0
02-18-2009, 04:54 AM
Put me in space with a chick and i'll show you anything's possible!

whiteheadedboy
02-18-2009, 05:08 AM
Huh,

First thing that comes to mind is

"What does it look/feel like?"

But it isn't probably fun..
When making love, its probably best to have a ground under you..

Psycho Mantis
02-23-2009, 03:57 PM
I don't know why people are thinking about this so much. No one will ever have sex in space for the forseeable future...

Mirai Aoi
02-23-2009, 06:33 PM
Actually it would be very difficult. Sex requires you to able to get traction and or leverage in order to thrust. With no gravity there is nothing to push or brace against. She or he will just move away when you thrust towards and you will continue to move towards them after your first thrust. In fact you wont be able to pull back since there is nothing to get traction on. it just would not be a very fun or arousing experience in my opinion. It would in fact be much more work then normal sex and would quickly become a chore.
You could fasten to each other using belt or such and then making floating sex :neko:

RedSerpent55
02-23-2009, 06:40 PM
This would be pretty interesting to see :P
I'm just worried about the cleanup at the end...might be a little tough.

playerdude
02-23-2009, 06:57 PM
hmmm the idea makes me want to try it now that i think about it just to see how it is lol ^_^ oh and uhh for scientific studies for the people studying that stuff as well XD

SniperTak
02-24-2009, 03:00 PM
Takes the mile high club to a new level... Im damn sure it would be hard to move your, uh, hips, in an antigravity environment.

Garudyne
02-24-2009, 03:25 PM
I think its absolutely possible... but cleaning up that mess afterwars will be
tough

solarenemy
02-24-2009, 03:54 PM
We never said it would be impossible, just very difficult and a lot more trouble then the reward is worth. I would rather have sex in VW bug.

Fireburn
03-12-2009, 03:45 PM
An interesting idea...:p

Deere666
03-13-2009, 03:19 AM
well, i suggest to those that want to try the experience of having sex in space, that things like elastic bands on waist, and maybe ankles, can be a good help in not being throwed to bounce your head on the walls all the times you do a move, for reaction ..... and a net over the bed can help too, for not just fly away here and there :D :neko:

idoffei
03-13-2009, 12:44 PM
I can see it now, the International Space Station crashed today because the crew were having sex and their body fluid, floating, got to the instruments causing it the short circuit resulting in the destruction of the station, hundreds of millions of dollars wasted, and the death of the said crew.

blozzee
03-16-2009, 09:53 AM
^ that wasn't the main cause of the accident, It was all started when some pervert astronomer shoving his penis into the black hole causing the cyclic gravity to become unstable which resulted the space station to implodes from the reaction..

laclos
03-16-2009, 10:43 AM
Almost as good as Pigs in Space!, but better.

M4ster Inc0gnit0
03-20-2009, 12:34 PM
That could spark the space industry again!
I can already see it;

'Sex in space for all members'
Yearly, and life memberships sold at the spaceport. Pick your own crew for a extra fee per trip. In case of disaster memberships will not be transferable.
crap got to quit spacing out...

:smoke:

kerisu
03-26-2009, 10:02 PM
I saw a thing about zero G sex on the Science channel. According to them:
It's harder to get an erection. In fact, one of the first men on the moon (Forgot if it was John Glen or Buzz Aldrin) claimed to have suffered from "extremely painful morning wood" (no other astronauts claim to have that problem) Because blood circulates differently in Zero G
Boobs are bigger and bouncier, and penises are longer.
If you come outside in Zero G, it will float aimlessly around the chamber
Sexual positions are harder to keep. Normally, Gravity will push you together. Anti-gravity pulls you apart. both partners need to keep a firm grip on one another
You are under constant, 360-degree surveillence by NASA, who has at least five scientists watching you live in Houston (In case you have a problem)

Fireburn
03-26-2009, 10:19 PM
I saw a thing about zero G sex on the Science channel. According to them:
It's harder to get an erection. In fact, one of the first men on the moon (Forgot if it was John Glen or Buzz Aldrin) claimed to have suffered from "extremely painful morning wood" (no other astronauts claim to have that problem) Because blood circulates differently in Zero G
Boobs are bigger and bouncier, and penises are longer.
If you come outside in Zero G, it will float aimlessly around the chamber
Sexual positions are harder to keep. Normally, Gravity will push you together. Anti-gravity pulls you apart. both partners need to keep a firm grip on one another
You are under constant, 360-degree surveillence by NASA, who has at least five scientists watching you live in Houston (In case you have a problem)


Nice explanation. :kakashi: ^^

Deere666
03-27-2009, 04:08 AM
You are under constant, 360-degree surveillence by NASA, who has at least five scientists watching you live in Houston (In case you have a problem)


UH ..... well, this can be the main problem, for non-exibitionist ones :P ..... anyway, with a bit of adhesive tape on the lenses, it can be solved :neko: (and you can left the audio opened, for the fun to have the scentists trying to understand what are those strange louds in the background, and if they have something to do with some problem) ..... :roflmao: